Amen to the tenor and tone of a Washington Post article on Obama’s handling of the latest crisis in his Presidency – the thwarted terrorist attack aboard Delta/Northwest Airlines flight to Detroit from Amsterdam Christmas Day:
KAILUA, HAWAII — President Obama has performed a difficult but familiar balancing act over the past few days: ordering new security measures in the wake of an attempted airliner attack without excessively alarming the public — or triggering an outcry from civil liberties advocates.
He has done so almost entirely out of sight. On vacation in Hawaii, tucked away in a lush neighborhood where his family is renting a waterfront home, Obama dispatched surrogates back in Washington — chiefly Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano and press secretary Robert Gibbs, who appeared on the Sunday talk shows — to reassure the public and explain his approach.……………………………………………………..
For Obama, who campaigned on a promise of restoring respect for individual rights and shifting away from the Bush-era “war on terror,” the struggle between security and freedom is defining his presidency much as it did his predecessor’s. Three of his most important national security speeches — one at the National Archives in the spring, one announcing a troop increase in Afghanistan and one accepting the Nobel Peace prize on Dec. 10 — addressed the need for a reasonable balance between competing goals.
……………………………………………
If he calibrated his message, it was by allowing others to toe the national security line for the first few days. “It’s not that the president sat back and thought, ‘How do I find the middle course?’ ” an official said on Sunday. “The president was presented with the facts and said, ‘What are the steps we need to take to protect the American people and make sure they understand all the requisite steps are indeed being taken and implemented?’ “
The above article goes on to note the perils that Obama faces when he takes the middle road: with some decisions he angers liberals; with other decisions he angers conservatives. Having his seconds handle matters until he investigates all aspects of an issue, he appears weak and indecisive.
In a war on terror, timing is of the essence. It is one thing to study policy change, it is another to do it in the middle of a crisis. Herein lies the discomfort with Obama. Perhaps herein lies the explanation for Iran, Korea and now al-Qaeda to test his reaction times! They more than anyone realize the import of timing.
And how many more times will the Obama administration be surprised by the determined actions of rogue states, rogue stateless terrorists and rogue former governors? Increasingly, Obama is leading the life of, well, Howard Hughes! But he is not a reclusive leader in industry. He is the reclusive leader of a major player in international politics. If the US falls deeper into debt and respect for Obama’s leadership abilities is further questioned by his delayed responses, US international prestige will suffer further. For this Obama must accept responsibility.
If the US appears more vulnerable, then the President’s policy of “calibrating” his response will have made future incidents more than likely to happen. He needs to strike another important balance: That between calibrated and swift responses to foreign and domestic threats. If not, he may someday find himself in a fast-moving, multi-stage crisis that would leave calibrated responses in the dust.
HOWEVER – here is a theory. There may have been reasons beyond the President’s control why he did not come before the public after the first attack. Because of security fears, he and his family may have been relocated.
Another view of his not coming forward in person would be that to do so may have made the situation seem more dire than it already was. It would underline that the situation was fully in control if his seconds cared for it publicly. It also would have shored up those travelers who would have been apprehensive of flying again.
______________________________
SisterToldjah – Napolitano: “System worked” in terror attack attempt on Detroit-bound plane
roxannadanna
December 28, 2009
Okay. This whole thing really pisses me off!!!!
$4000/night for 2 weeks! and he rented the neighboring 2 homes too?
ohhhh I could really start swearing but then you’d ban me from posting….
this is disgusting! And Reagan stayed in the White House at Christmas for his secret service to be with their families…
This guy is a total jerk!
samhenry
December 28, 2009
I’m as steamed about it as you are. He is not a model. There is news he may want to buy this property. And what underhanded deal would he carry out to do this? He had a less than legal deal when he bought his Chicago house. Thanks for your support of MY outrage at this.
The Morb
December 28, 2009
Hi Sam!
Another great read !! Hope you’re doing well …
I just have to say this tho … Democrat / Republican / Independent / WHATEVER ! … You’re asking quite a bit from any individual in the position of President of the United States … He’s damned one way or the other !!! … I know if was in that position … my finger would have pressed the button long ago … and history would crucify me for it … But that’s me … I suppose if I were actually in that position … I’d have all those people telling me I can’t do that and I would have to temper my instincts … as BO and George Jr before him had too … YA CAN’T WIN !! …
A Kenyan …schooled in Britain … as a result of the freedoms of our society … shoves explosives in his scivvies … GETS ON A PLANE !! … and tries to kill as many people as he can ?!!! …
Well I know how I’d handle it !!
CLICK !!!
samhenry
December 28, 2009
MORB! Good to see you. I agree it is hard to “calibrate” these things but I would at least go on TV – not to alarm but to Calm. I suppose he stayed off the TV as a way of letting the public know that it would be OK to travel. There could have been another reason. We don’t know if he had to be relocated during the time it was happening and for a longer period – especially with the second scare.
hepsy
December 28, 2009
That isn’t Kailua Beach, that’s Lanikai Beach, a bit more exclusive.
It’s costing much more than $4,000 a night. Local business has forfeited as roads and air traffic are restricted, as are attractions like Arizona Memorial. That means that our taxes are sure to increase, again, to make up the loss of tourist income Obama is preventing.
Don’t know why he didn’t want to stay at the White House. But then, he never claimed to be patriotic, or give a hoot about American economics.
samhenry
December 29, 2009
Thanks for the beach front correction, hepsy.
I am sickened by the TOTAL cost to us by his being there.
I have read where he wants to purchase that property. What shady source will he use to finance that? Purchase of his Chicago home was already this side of honest.